Franchise Self-Employment: Another Episode
In practice, it often happens that a franchisor finds it difficult to recruit new franchisees. The cause for this can be many. Particularly in the second half of the 90s, there was a general labor shortage on the labor market, which was also reflected in the availability of new franchisees. In tough economic times, potential franchisees sometimes lack the necessary capital to start a business on an independent basis.
In practice, the latter circumstance in particular is often taken care of by franchisors by allowing franchisees to start as an employee/branch holder for a certain period, after which period they become independent and continue the branch as a franchisee. The franchisee then purchases the business from the franchisor. In some cases, the purchase price is financed by the franchisor by means of a loan or similar arrangement, which allows the franchisee concerned to continue the business for his own account, even without equity, after a certain trial period.
Constructions as described above are quite workable in themselves. It is true that in such situations extra attention must be paid to the independence of the franchisee(s) involved. Naturally, it must at all times be prevented that the UWV or the tax authorities come to the conclusion during an inspection that there is a so-called fictitious employment relationship in this context: the franchisee is then not an independent entrepreneur with regard to the Social Insurance legislation and the Tax legislation. , resulting in the consequences described earlier in this section, including cancellation of social deduction options, retroactive premium levying and all kinds of possible fines. This is more pressing in this situation than elsewhere because the franchisee, in the example described above, was first an employee of the franchisor. If there is also a financing construction, the UWV and the Fiscus will take an extra critical look at the whole. In general, it is therefore strongly recommended that an informal preliminary assessment be carried out by the UWV and the Tax and Customs Administration in such situations, so that uncertainties on this point can be removed and remedied in a timely manner.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages
Article Franchise+ – “Immediate information obligations of franchisors upon operation of the Franchise Act” – mr. AW Dolphijn – dated June 25, 2020
As soon as the Franchise Act enters into force, this will have an immediate effect on franchise agreements that already exist. The question is whether the information flows are set up optimally from a legal point of view.
Senate will adopt Franchise Act – dated 24 June 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The House of Representatives had unanimously adopted the proposal to introduce the Franchise Act on 16 June 2020
Franchise Act passed by the House of Representatives – dated 16 June 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Franchise Act was adopted by the House of Representatives on 16 June 2020.
Sandd franchisees find satisfaction in nullifying Sandd and PostNL merger – dated 12 June 2020
The franchisees of mail delivery company Sandd went to court in November, assisted by Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten. Court of Rotterdam rules on takeover by PostNL.
Plenary debate dated June 9, 2020 in the Lower House of the Franchise Act – dated June 10, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
On 9 June 2020, the legislative proposal for the Franchise Act was discussed in plenary in the House of Representatives. An amendment and a motion have been tabled.
Franchising is “a bottleneck in tackling healthcare fraud” – dated 10 June 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
According to the various supervisory authorities in the healthcare sector, franchise constructions can be seen as a non-transparent business construction in which the supervision of professional and



