Merged franchisor competes with proprietary franchisees
If a franchise organization is taken over, the intention may be that it is phased out in order to be integrated into the acquiring party. The question then is how to deal if potential customers flow from the franchisees of the acquired franchise organization to the new organization. The Midden-Nederland District Court ruled on such a matter on 29 July 2022, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2022:3148.
Funeral organization Yarden has been taken over by competitor Dela. Yarden’s franchise organization and formula is being phased out to be integrated into Dela. Yarden’s customer contact center and phone number are at some point operated and handled by Dela. The services of Dela are also promoted in Yarden’s social media. As a result, Yarden’s franchisees suffer damage. The franchisees argue that Yarden competes with its own franchisees by referring to its (new) group company Dela.
Yarden stated that these are incidental errors, that effective measures have now been taken and that compensation is offered for the errors. The franchisees state that the errors and referrals continue. Furthermore, Yarden states that it cannot do much about the errors, but that it would be due to other organizations within its group, such as Yarden Uitvaarten BV
The court agrees with the franchisees and believes that the errors are not incidental, and that Yarden, as a franchisor, cannot hide behind the actions of affiliates. The court orders Yarden, as the franchisor, to cease referrals to Dela, under penalty of a penalty.
This judgment shows that the process of changing a franchise formula requires due diligence, which was lacking in this case.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Bankrupt because the franchisor refused to sell the franchise company – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of The Hague has dealt with a request from a franchisor to declare a franchisee bankrupt.
Prescribed shop fitting – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Midden-Nederland District Court has ruled on whether a franchisee is obliged to carry the shop fittings prescribed by the franchisor.
Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys summon Sandd and PostNL on behalf of the Sandd franchisees – dated 9 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) has today summoned Sandd and PostNL before the court in Arnhem. The VFS believes that Sandd and PostNL are letting the franchisees down hard.
Article The National Franchise Guide: “Why joint and several liability, for example, next to private?” – dated 7 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Franchisees are often asked to co-sign the franchise agreement in addition to their franchise, for example. Sometimes franchisees refuse to do so and the franchise agreement is not signed.
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten assists Sandd franchisees: Franchisees Sandd challenge postal monopoly in court – dated 12 November 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) is challenging the decision of State Secretary Mona Keijzer to approve the postal merger between PostNL and Sandd before the court in Rotterdam.
Franchisee trapped by non-compete clause? – dated October 21, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of East Brabant has ruled that a franchisee was still bound by the non-competition clause in the event of premature termination of the franchise agreement.