Biography
Maaike Munnik graduated in corporate law from Leiden University in 2012, where she also focused on intellectual property law. During and after her studies she worked for a legal expenses insurer where she worked for several years in the general advisory practice. At the beginning of 2016, she made the transition to the legal profession and now works for Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten, where she is active in both the advisory and litigation practice. Maaike Munnik assists both franchisors and franchisees (on an individual basis or collectively).
Study
- Law and Business Administration, Leiden University (2011)
- Dutch law, Corporate law, Leiden University (2012)
Messages from Maaike Munnik:
- 13-10-2023 | Does an agreed rent indexation always apply?
- 12-07-2023 | Car dealer wrongly not a franchisee?
- 19-07-2022 | More clarity on online sales through renewed block exemption regulation for vertical agreements
- 10-05-2022 | The franchise agreement under suspensory condition: major consequences
- 11-01-2022 | Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Franchisee exclusively bound by a non-compete clause as a private company” – mr. M. Munnik – dated January 11, 2022
- 15-11-2021 | Article Franchise+: “Is the franchisor bound by the statutes of the franchisees’ association?” – mr. M. Munnik – dated November 11, 2021
- 17-08-2021 | Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Does the Franchise Act offer guidance in the event of disputes arising before January 1, 2021?” – mr. M. Munnik – dated August 16, 2021
- 23-06-2021 | Supermarket Newsletter – No. 31 –
- 24-07-2019 | Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Parliamentary questions asked about (false) self-employment franchisees” – dated 24 July 2019 – mr. M. Munnik
- 08-05-2019 | Franchise arbitration: too high a threshold? – mr. M. Munnik
- 06-03-2019 | Franchisor liable for forecasts from third parties – dated March 6, 2019 – mr. M. Munnik
- 25-05-2018 | Consumer Protection Applies to Franchisee
- 04-04-2018 | Column Franchise+ – Franchisor acts unlawfully by providing a forecast through a third party
- | Column Franchise+ – Outsourcing forecasting to an administrative office does not benefit the franchisor
- 03-04-2018 | Outsourcing prognosis to an administrative office does not benefit the franchisor
- 18-07-2016 | Arbitration clause may not disadvantage the franchisee: nullification
- 16-06-2016 | Franchisor remains liable for incorrect prognosis