Legal workshop Turnover forecasts at Ludwig & Van Dam
Legal workshop November 26
How do you ensure a prognosis that is claim-proof? Many franchise disputes revolve around issued sales forecasts. Recent rulings show a shift in forecasting issues to the detriment of franchisors.
Franchisors want to avoid lawsuits. A great deal of damage can be prevented by correctly responding to recent developments. This may require an update of your franchise agreement.
On Thursday 26 November we organize in collaboration with the Dutch Franchise Association the legal workshop Turnover Forecasts . In this interactive workshop, provisions related to forecasts in franchise agreements are discussed and tips are given on how to make a forecast claim-proof.
Program:
|
3:30 pm |
Reception |
|
4:00 pm – 6:00 pm |
Interactive workshop by: Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn, |
|
6 p.m |
Finally a drink and snack |
This workshop is intended for franchise formulas. This workshop is free for NFV members and non-members pay €150.00 excl. VAT.
You can register via the website of the NFV: http://www.nfv.nl/agenda/73/juridische-workshop-26-november/
Location
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys
River Street 159
3016 CH Rotterdam
Other messages
Does the employment contract end when entering into a franchise agreement?
Does the employment contract end when entering into a franchise agreement?
Change in store franchisee’s entrance to be regarded as a defect?
Change in store franchisee's entrance to be regarded as a defect?
Recognize qualitative obligations with a business premises franchisee in a timely manner
The court in 's-Hertogenbosch was recently confronted with the following case against a municipality.
Can a franchisee rely on the franchisor’s forecasts?
The Court of Haarlem recently ruled on a franchise issue in which prognosis problems were discussed.
Transfer of rental rights supermarket location
Transfer of rental rights supermarket location
Termination of lease agreement after purchase of retail space
At the end of 2010, the Supreme Court ruled on the waiting period that applies to termination due to urgent personal use.