Master Franchising: Watch Your Saeck
The phenomenon of master franchising is increasingly making its appearance in the Netherlands. In short, this means that a foreign franchise organization develops activities in other countries through master franchisees, who then recruit franchisees themselves in the countries concerned, and thus, as it were, between the franchisees “in the field” and the main organization. Such an instrument, when used properly, offers an excellent opportunity to achieve international expansion. In practice, American organizations sometimes use this instrument.
It is important that such a construction is designed carefully. First, there is the issue of liabilities, particularly in relation to the master franchisee. After all, it has a contractual relationship with the master franchisor, as well as with its own franchisees. Rights and obligations must, of course, be adequately defined. Furthermore, it is generally reasonable to establish a clear boundary, both in legal and in fact terms, between the national franchise portion and the relationship with the master franchisor. An important question in this context is the law of which country the various agreements are concluded. The master franchisor sometimes stipulates that this must be done in accordance with the law of the country of origin, for example American law. On the other hand, the master franchisee, in the Netherlands, for example, will almost always contract with his franchisees under Dutch law. It is important to make an adequate and detailed inventory of the possible consequences of the choice for these two different legal systems. It is also the case that American (master) franchise agreements often have content that is not always in line with, for example, Dutch legal practice. This can, in some cases, lead to situations that no one thinks of so quickly in advance.
The title of this piece is therefore an urgent piece of advice, especially to (potential) master franchisees: make sure that you know exactly where you stand with regard to the aforementioned and various other (legal) questions. Franchisees of a master franchisee are also well advised to ensure in advance that the organization has been built up in a responsible manner.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Legal Franchise Statistics 2019: slight decrease in number of franchise disputes
In 2018, 44 judgments were published on Rechtspraak.nl, 12 of which were appeal cases and one in cassation (a prognosis issue against Albert Heijn).
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Judge again rules in favor of Domino’s franchisees” – dated September 3, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers
At the beginning of 2018, almost all franchisees of Domino's and the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees submitted two issues to the court in Rotterdam.
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “The interim termination of the franchise agreement” – August 12, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
A franchise agreement can end prematurely in many ways.
Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Parliamentary questions asked about (false) self-employment franchisees” – dated 24 July 2019 – mr. M. Munnik
Parliamentary questions have recently been asked about the so-called bogus self-employment within the relationship between franchisor and franchisee.
Article Franchise+: “With our franchise formula you will earn mountains of gold.” dated 10 July 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The distinction between permissible promotions and misleading information remains a gray area, despite the relevant legislation.
Franchisee may purchase a range of foreign products after mandatory formula change – June 6, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
The District Court of East Brabant recently dealt with an important matter in preliminary relief proceedings in which a franchisee was completely involuntarily forced to adopt an alternative formula.