On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation
The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,
Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.
“Because the municipality undertakes and renovates all sorts of things in the vicinity of my business, I have a disadvantage and I suffer damage. Can I tell those stories?"
“I am bothered by the smell that the adjacent catering business produces. Can I do something about this?"
A judgment of 28 July 2016 by the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:6138, concerned the sale of shares in two companies in which an Albert Heijn supermarket
Tax fraud among 45% of Super de Boer franchisees
Penalty obligation for the franchisor for failure to comply with the franchise agreement
Infringement of franchisee's exclusivity rights: franchisor liable
Advantage in the event of an illegal supply stop
