Supermarket Newsletter – No. 34 –
ACM PUBLISHES COOP/PLUS MERGER DECISION
In the supermarket newsletter of December 22, 2021 we informed you that ACM had announced that it approved the merger of Coop and Plus on the condition that supermarkets must be sold in 12 market areas, namely the shops in Harmelen, Hollandscheveld, Rolde, Ruurlo, Stolwijk, Terborg, Wehl, Groot -Ammers, Wekerom, Ravenstein, Uddel and Vlieland. Seven of these supermarkets are operated by franchisees.
On January 6, ACM published its full decision , in which it explains why it has approved the merger. It is remarkable that ACM considers that online sales have increased, but that it still believes that these sales should not be included in its assessment. In this context, ACM points out that no provider has a full national network and that Plus and Coop have a limited market share (8%) in the online market in relation to, for example, Albert Heijn (50%) and Picnic and Jumbo (20%). .
In its decision, ACM also considers that the viability, marketability and competitiveness of the 12 supermarkets to be divested would be sufficiently safeguarded in the remedy proposal of Coop en Plus that ACM accepted.
This would appear, among other things, from the obligations of Coop and Plus contained therein, which – in short – amount to the fact that they must do everything they can to ensure that the supermarkets to be transferred retain their value and remain viable and competitive. An independent trustee is appointed to oversee the above. In the event that the parties fail to sell the supermarkets within the set (undisclosed) timeframes, a sales trustee will be appointed and authorized to transfer the supermarkets.
It is definitely recommended that the entrepreneurs involved seek the assistance of experts, so that they can properly assess the opportunities and risks of the above process. The decision may also offer opportunities for entrepreneurs of other formats to expand.
As a specialist in (supermarket) franchise and market leader, Ludwig & Van Dam has ample
experience in guiding such projects.
For more information:
Jeroen Strong Alex Dolphin
Email: Sterk@ludwigvandam.nl Email: dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Do you want to respond? Then email to info@ludwigvandamadvocaten.nl
Other messages
Fine for franchisor because aspiring franchisee is foreigner
On 5 July 2017, the Council of State, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1815, decided whether, in the case of (proposed) cooperation between a franchisor and a prospective franchisee, the franchisor
Article in Entrance: “Company name”
“I came up with a wonderful name for my catering company and incurred the necessary costs for this. Now there is another entrepreneur who is going to use almost the same one. Is that allowed?"
The bank’s duty of care in franchise agreements
On 23 May 2017, the Court of Appeal in The Hague, EQLI:NL:GHDHA:2017:1368, had to rule on the question whether the bank should have warned a prospective franchisee in connection with the
Article in Entrance: “Standing up”
“Can I fire an employee with immediate effect if he steals something trivial, such as food that has passed its expiration date?”
Arbitration clause in franchise agreement sometimes inconvenient
On 20 July 2016, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2016:4868, ruled on the validity of an agreement in a franchise agreement, whereby disputes would be settled
Supermarket letter – 18
Can an entrepreneur be obliged to operate a different supermarket formula?