Vacancy: Lawyer employee and a Lawyer trainee
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten is a law firm that specializes entirely in franchise and other partnerships and is the market leader of its kind in the Netherlands. The office has extensive knowledge and experience and is characterized by a high level of thinking and working. Due to growth of the practice, we are looking for a:
Attorney-at-law
and a:
Lawyer trainee
Specific experience in the franchise practice is a plus.
We offer a working environment where you can work and develop in an excellent and relaxed collegial atmosphere. Some relevant work experience is desirable.
Information can be requested from Mr. Th.R. Ludwig, e-mail address: ludwig@ludwigvandam.nl or mw. mr. M. Munnik, e-mail address: munnik@ludwigvandam.nl , to whom the application letter can also be addressed.
You can also send your written application to the following address:
Ludwig & Van Dam Attorneys
Attn Mrs. mr. Munnik
Park avenue 44
3016 BC ROTTERDAM
Do you want to respond? Then email to info@ludwigvandamadvocaten.nl
Other messages
The limitation of a non-competition clause
A former franchisee has a non-compete clause in his franchise agreement that prohibits him from cooperating during and for two years after the termination of the franchise agreement.
Franchise agreement/sublease agreement link
Franchise agreements and sublease agreements must be adequately linked. After all, the sublease agreement is governed by mandatory tenancy law. Not easy here
Franchising is serious business
Franchise practice is characterized by a wide variety of issues that manifest themselves in it.
Price maintenance: always void?
The Court of Appeal in The Hague ruled some time ago that influencing the price level at which the franchisee sells the products to the consumer can be susceptible to competition law.
Another franchisor against will and thanks?
For various reasons, franchisors and franchisees are confronted with the (desire to) transfer of rights
Compensation for insufficient duty of care by the franchisor
Compensation for insufficient duty of care by the franchisor