Franchise Self-Employment: Another Episode
In practice, it often happens that a franchisor finds it difficult to recruit new franchisees. The cause for this can be many. Particularly in the second half of the 90s, there was a general labor shortage on the labor market, which was also reflected in the availability of new franchisees. In tough economic times, potential franchisees sometimes lack the necessary capital to start a business on an independent basis.
In practice, the latter circumstance in particular is often taken care of by franchisors by allowing franchisees to start as an employee/branch holder for a certain period, after which period they become independent and continue the branch as a franchisee. The franchisee then purchases the business from the franchisor. In some cases, the purchase price is financed by the franchisor by means of a loan or similar arrangement, which allows the franchisee concerned to continue the business for his own account, even without equity, after a certain trial period.
Constructions as described above are quite workable in themselves. It is true that in such situations extra attention must be paid to the independence of the franchisee(s) involved. Naturally, it must at all times be prevented that the UWV or the tax authorities come to the conclusion during an inspection that there is a so-called fictitious employment relationship in this context: the franchisee is then not an independent entrepreneur with regard to the Social Insurance legislation and the Tax legislation. , resulting in the consequences described earlier in this section, including cancellation of social deduction options, retroactive premium levying and all kinds of possible fines. This is more pressing in this situation than elsewhere because the franchisee, in the example described above, was first an employee of the franchisor. If there is also a financing construction, the UWV and the Fiscus will take an extra critical look at the whole. In general, it is therefore strongly recommended that an informal preliminary assessment be carried out by the UWV and the Tax and Customs Administration in such situations, so that uncertainties on this point can be removed and remedied in a timely manner.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?
On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.
Mandatory (market-based) purchase prices for franchisees
To what extent can a franchisor change agreements about the (market) purchase prices of the goods that the franchisees are obliged to purchase?
Director’s liability of a franchisee after failing to rely on an unsound prognosis.
On 11 July 2017, the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch made a decision on whether the franchisor could successfully sue the director of a BV for non-compliance with the
Liability accountant for prepared prognosis?
In a judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 11 July 2017, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2017:3153, it was discussed that franchisees accused the franchisor's accountant of being liable
How far does the bank’s duty of care extend?
Some time ago the question was raised in case law what the position of the bank is in the triangular relationship franchisor – bank – franchisee.
Burden of proof reversal in forecasting as misleading advertising?
In an interlocutory judgment of 15 June 2017, the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2017:3833, ruled on a claim for (among other things) suspension of the non-compete clause.