Legal workshop Turnover forecasts at Ludwig & Van Dam
Legal workshop November 26
How do you ensure a prognosis that is claim-proof? Many franchise disputes revolve around issued sales forecasts. Recent rulings show a shift in forecasting issues to the detriment of franchisors.
Franchisors want to avoid lawsuits. A great deal of damage can be prevented by correctly responding to recent developments. This may require an update of your franchise agreement.
On Thursday 26 November we organize in collaboration with the Dutch Franchise Association the legal workshop Turnover Forecasts . In this interactive workshop, provisions related to forecasts in franchise agreements are discussed and tips are given on how to make a forecast claim-proof.
Program:
|
3:30 pm |
Reception |
|
4:00 pm – 6:00 pm |
Interactive workshop by: Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn, |
|
6 p.m |
Finally a drink and snack |
This workshop is intended for franchise formulas. This workshop is free for NFV members and non-members pay €150.00 excl. VAT.
You can register via the website of the NFV: http://www.nfv.nl/agenda/73/juridische-workshop-26-november/
Location
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys
River Street 159
3016 CH Rotterdam

Other messages
Franchisor hinders litigation – An unbalanced arbitration clause
It has been agreed in a franchise agreement that disputes will be settled by arbitration, to be held in New York, in the English language.
DA Drugstore head office clashes hard with franchisees
DA Drugstore head office clashes hard with franchisees
Competing without a non-competition clause?
The franchise non-compete obligation remains a source of dispute.
Non-competition clause set aside; big consequences
Non-competition clause set aside; big consequences
Judgment association of franchisees versus franchisor regarding the roll-out of an alternative franchise formula
Judgment association of franchisees versus franchisor regarding the roll-out of an alternative franchise formula
Continuation of operation, despite substantial backlog of franchise fee?
Can the franchisee continue to operate despite a significant franchise fee payment arrears?