Preferential right of purchase in lease does not apply – September 7, 2018 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of The Hague ruled on 5 September 2018, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2018:10554, that a share transaction within the tenant’s organization does not mean that the landlord can invoke the pre-emptive right stipulated in favor of the landlord of buy.
However, it should be noted that the rental agreement and the pre-emptive right of purchase were concluded at the time by expert parties and expert advisers and that there was an ‘intercompany’ rental agreement within the same group. Therefore, according to the court, great weight should be attached to the linguistic meaning of the chosen wording of the agreement in this specific case. Therefore, the pre-emptive right of purchase cannot be circumvented in all cases by means of a transaction of the shares in the lessee.
mr. AW Dolphin – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Contact
Other messages
Attorneys Ludwig & Van Dam look back on transition process C1000
Attorneys Ludwig & Van Dam look back on transition process C1000
Interview Mr. AW Dolphijn and mr. J. Sterk on transition process C1000
Interview Mr. AW Dolphijn and mr. J. Sterk on transition process C1000
Mitigation fine of franchise agreement at supermarket
On 22 April 2015, the East Brabant District Court ruled on a dispute between a franchisee and a franchisor (Emté Franchise BV).
Arbitration clause applicable to franchise agreement? Maybe not
An arbitration clause is occasionally found in franchise agreements.
(Directors’ and shareholders’) liability in the event of transfer or phasing out the franchise formula
(Directors' and shareholders') liability in the event of transfer or phasing out the franchise formula
Directors’ liability in the event of an incorrect forecast
On 4 February 2015, the Rotterdam District Court rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether the director of a selling legal entity was liable.