Supermarket Newsletter – No. 34 –
ACM PUBLISHES COOP/PLUS MERGER DECISION
In the supermarket newsletter of December 22, 2021 we informed you that ACM had announced that it approved the merger of Coop and Plus on the condition that supermarkets must be sold in 12 market areas, namely the shops in Harmelen, Hollandscheveld, Rolde, Ruurlo, Stolwijk, Terborg, Wehl, Groot -Ammers, Wekerom, Ravenstein, Uddel and Vlieland. Seven of these supermarkets are operated by franchisees.
On January 6, ACM published its full decision , in which it explains why it has approved the merger. It is remarkable that ACM considers that online sales have increased, but that it still believes that these sales should not be included in its assessment. In this context, ACM points out that no provider has a full national network and that Plus and Coop have a limited market share (8%) in the online market in relation to, for example, Albert Heijn (50%) and Picnic and Jumbo (20%). .
In its decision, ACM also considers that the viability, marketability and competitiveness of the 12 supermarkets to be divested would be sufficiently safeguarded in the remedy proposal of Coop en Plus that ACM accepted.
This would appear, among other things, from the obligations of Coop and Plus contained therein, which – in short – amount to the fact that they must do everything they can to ensure that the supermarkets to be transferred retain their value and remain viable and competitive. An independent trustee is appointed to oversee the above. In the event that the parties fail to sell the supermarkets within the set (undisclosed) timeframes, a sales trustee will be appointed and authorized to transfer the supermarkets.
It is definitely recommended that the entrepreneurs involved seek the assistance of experts, so that they can properly assess the opportunities and risks of the above process. The decision may also offer opportunities for entrepreneurs of other formats to expand.
As a specialist in (supermarket) franchise and market leader, Ludwig & Van Dam has ample
experience in guiding such projects.
For more information:
Jeroen Strong Alex Dolphin
Email: Sterk@ludwigvandam.nl Email: dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Do you want to respond? Then email to info@ludwigvandamadvocaten.nl
Other messages
Termination of a dealer agreement in relation to price maintenance
At the end of 2007, the Court of Appeal in Arnhem issued an interesting ruling concerning
Restyling forecasts
As is well known, a good franchisor offers its franchisee a good deal at the start
Nuanced franchise agreement on the grounds of error is a nuanced consideration
The Court in preliminary relief proceedings in Rotterdam recently ruled that a franchisor is not automatically responsible
The duty to offer in the franchise agreement is not valid
Recently, the Court of Appeal determined that an obligation of the franchisee
Franchise agreements of an indefinite term cannot be terminated just like that
Contrary to what is sometimes thought, franchise agreements for an indefinite period cannot be terminated just like that.
Sale of a franchise company, a subject to consider in good time
When entering into the franchise agreement, the fact that and under what conditions is not always considered in good time