The limitation of a non-competition clause
Court of Almelo, preliminary relief judge
A former franchisee has a non-compete clause in his franchise agreement, which prohibits him from entering into a partnership with a party competing with the franchisor during and for two years after the termination of the franchise agreement. Apparently, the ex-franchisee intends to become an employee of such a competitor, because he asks the court to prohibit the franchisor from implementing the non-compete clause. The court takes a very formal approach and states that, partly in view of the termination of the franchise agreement, only the former franchisee can (still) implement the non-compete clause. In the opinion of the court, imposing an injunction on the franchisor is therefore not appropriate.
Mr JH Kolenbrander – Franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice Would you like to respond? Mail to coalbrander@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Albert Heijn has to divest 5 Jan Linders stores
Jan Linders becomes an Albert Heijn franchisee and will therefore ...
Agreed early termination of the franchise agreement
A franchise agreement is usually concluded for a specific period ...
No obligation to use a rental property as a supermarket
The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal has made a decision on ...
Rent indexation unrealistically high
Does an agreed rent indexation always apply? The District Court ...
Clarity pays off
Clarity pays off Many agreements sometimes use vague definitions ...
Continued activities of the franchisee do not violate a non-competition clause
A judgment was recently rendered in preliminary relief proceedings in ...