Vacancy lawyer-employee
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten is a law firm that specializes entirely in franchise and other partnerships and is the market leader of its kind in the Netherlands. The office has extensive knowledge and experience and is characterized by a high level of thinking and working. Due to growth of the practice, we are looking for a:
Attorney-at-law
Specific experience in the franchise practice is a plus.
We offer a working environment where you can work and develop in an excellent and relaxed collegial atmosphere. Some relevant work experience is desirable.
Information can be requested from Mr. DL van Dam, e-mail address: vandam@ludwigvandam.nl, mr. J. Sterk e-mail address:sterk@ludwigvandam.nl or mr. AW Dolphijn, e-mail address: dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl, to whom the application letter can also be addressed.
Other messages
Article Franchise & Law No. 7 – Franchise agreement as general terms and conditions
Uniformity of the franchise formula and (therefore also) uniformity of the agreements with the franchisees will often be of great importance to the franchisor.
The franchisee’s customer base
If the partnership between a franchisee and a franchisor ends, the question of who will continue to serve the customers may arise.
The healthcare franchisor is not a healthcare provider
The Healthcare Quality, Complaints and Disputes Act (WKKGZ) creates the possibility of government measures being imposed on healthcare institutions to guarantee the required quality of healthcare.
The restructuring within the Intergamma formats from a legal perspective
The legal reality is sometimes more unruly than the factual. The controversial issue at Intergamma is a good example of this.
Open vacancy: lawyer-employee and/or lawyer-trainee!
Due to the departure of one of our colleagues, we are looking for a new lawyer-employee or lawyer-trainee. Interested?
Non-compete clause on the sale of a franchise business
How strict should a non-compete clause be when selling a franchise business to the franchisor? This question was raised in a dispute in which the District Court of Gelderland op