Franchise Self-Employment: Another Episode
In practice, it often happens that a franchisor finds it difficult to recruit new franchisees. The cause for this can be many. Particularly in the second half of the 90s, there was a general labor shortage on the labor market, which was also reflected in the availability of new franchisees. In tough economic times, potential franchisees sometimes lack the necessary capital to start a business on an independent basis.
In practice, the latter circumstance in particular is often taken care of by franchisors by allowing franchisees to start as an employee/branch holder for a certain period, after which period they become independent and continue the branch as a franchisee. The franchisee then purchases the business from the franchisor. In some cases, the purchase price is financed by the franchisor by means of a loan or similar arrangement, which allows the franchisee concerned to continue the business for his own account, even without equity, after a certain trial period.
Constructions as described above are quite workable in themselves. It is true that in such situations extra attention must be paid to the independence of the franchisee(s) involved. Naturally, it must at all times be prevented that the UWV or the tax authorities come to the conclusion during an inspection that there is a so-called fictitious employment relationship in this context: the franchisee is then not an independent entrepreneur with regard to the Social Insurance legislation and the Tax legislation. , resulting in the consequences described earlier in this section, including cancellation of social deduction options, retroactive premium levying and all kinds of possible fines. This is more pressing in this situation than elsewhere because the franchisee, in the example described above, was first an employee of the franchisor. If there is also a financing construction, the UWV and the Fiscus will take an extra critical look at the whole. In general, it is therefore strongly recommended that an informal preliminary assessment be carried out by the UWV and the Tax and Customs Administration in such situations, so that uncertainties on this point can be removed and remedied in a timely manner.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Damage estimate after wrongful termination of the franchise agreement by the franchisor
In a judgment of the Supreme Court of 15 September 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2372 (Franchisee/Coop), it was discussed that supermarket organization Coop had not complied with agreements, as a result of which the franchisee
Franchisor is obliged to extend the franchise agreement
On 6 September 2017, the Rotterdam District Court ruled, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:6975 (Misty / Bram Ladage), that the refusal to extend a franchise agreement by a franchisor
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.