Franchisees beware of data breaches (at the franchisor)
In franchise relationships, the processing of, for example, customer data of the franchisee is often reserved for the franchisor. It is not inconceivable that a franchisee is nevertheless responsible for data breaches of such personal data at the franchisor.
The obligation to report data breaches has recently entered into force, as part of the expansion of the Personal Data Protection Act. Violation of the rules is subject to a fine regime. A fine may also follow if data leaks are properly reported.
According to the law, there is an obligation to report to the Dutch Data Protection Authority if there is a security incident. This could include the loss of a USB stick, theft of hardware or a hacker breaking into the automation system. There must also be a loss of personal data or a (suspected) unlawful processing thereof. Unlawful processing includes, among other things, adjusting and/or changing personal data and unauthorized access to, or disclosure thereof. This concerns, for example, usernames and passwords, work performance and financial data that could lead to damage to honor and good name, (identity) fraud, discrimination or, for example, financial damage.
Franchisees have often stored personal data of their employees, customers or prospects on the franchisor’s network. A franchisee may also be required to do so under the franchise agreement. For example, customer data can be an important resource for the franchisor to, for example, align their marketing strategy. In that context, a franchisor can be qualified as a so-called processor.
Despite the engagement of a processor, such as a franchisor, the franchisee remains responsible for proper compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act and therefore also the data breach notification obligation.
The franchisor is obliged to follow the instructions of the franchisee and to comply with the principles regarding the processing of personal data. This is, for example, the obligation of careful and proportionate processing and having a specific purpose and legal basis for the processing.
It is important to be aware of this issue when drafting and concluding franchise agreements. A careful provision about the method of processing, processing and storage of personal data is advisable. For example, it could be agreed that the franchisor indemnifies the franchisee against fines for any form of data breach that occurs at the franchisor.
mr. AW Dolphijn – Franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Legal Franchise Statistics 2019: slight decrease in number of franchise disputes
In 2018, 44 judgments were published on Rechtspraak.nl, 12 of which were appeal cases and one in cassation (a prognosis issue against Albert Heijn).
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Judge again rules in favor of Domino’s franchisees” – dated September 3, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers
At the beginning of 2018, almost all franchisees of Domino's and the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees submitted two issues to the court in Rotterdam.
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “The interim termination of the franchise agreement” – August 12, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
A franchise agreement can end prematurely in many ways.
Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Parliamentary questions asked about (false) self-employment franchisees” – dated 24 July 2019 – mr. M. Munnik
Parliamentary questions have recently been asked about the so-called bogus self-employment within the relationship between franchisor and franchisee.
Article Franchise+: “With our franchise formula you will earn mountains of gold.” dated 10 July 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The distinction between permissible promotions and misleading information remains a gray area, despite the relevant legislation.
Franchisee may purchase a range of foreign products after mandatory formula change – June 6, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
The District Court of East Brabant recently dealt with an important matter in preliminary relief proceedings in which a franchisee was completely involuntarily forced to adopt an alternative formula.