Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018
The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam represents a franchisee in legal proceedings in which the franchisor has been convicted for the first time under the Acquisition Fraud Act. The court states that the franchisor must be able to demonstrate afterwards that the prognosis is correct. The position of franchisees has been greatly strengthened by this ruling. To be able to prove that a franchisor has its affairs in order, the franchisor must come from a good family, explain franchise attorneys Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam.
Other messages
Franchisor: protect your brand(s) well
As a franchisor, you have developed a franchise formula that distinguishes itself, among other things
Capital requirement in a competition law perspective
In practice, it often happens that, like any business, a franchisor or a franchisee needs
Non-competition clause in franchise agreement
Non-competition clause in franchise agreement
The importance of a statutory franchise arrangement
The franchise contract is not regulated by law. It is a so-called “unnamed agreement”.
Take timely measures with regard to your employees at the end of the franchise agreement
If you decide to cancel your franchise agreement and the franchise agreement comes to an end
Case law on franchising abroad
In general, this column focuses on Dutch law