Master Franchising: Watch Your Saeck
The phenomenon of master franchising is increasingly making its appearance in the Netherlands. In short, this means that a foreign franchise organization develops activities in other countries through master franchisees, who then recruit franchisees themselves in the countries concerned, and thus, as it were, between the franchisees “in the field” and the main organization. Such an instrument, when used properly, offers an excellent opportunity to achieve international expansion. In practice, American organizations sometimes use this instrument.
It is important that such a construction is designed carefully. First, there is the issue of liabilities, particularly in relation to the master franchisee. After all, it has a contractual relationship with the master franchisor, as well as with its own franchisees. Rights and obligations must, of course, be adequately defined. Furthermore, it is generally reasonable to establish a clear boundary, both in legal and in fact terms, between the national franchise portion and the relationship with the master franchisor. An important question in this context is the law of which country the various agreements are concluded. The master franchisor sometimes stipulates that this must be done in accordance with the law of the country of origin, for example American law. On the other hand, the master franchisee, in the Netherlands, for example, will almost always contract with his franchisees under Dutch law. It is important to make an adequate and detailed inventory of the possible consequences of the choice for these two different legal systems. It is also the case that American (master) franchise agreements often have content that is not always in line with, for example, Dutch legal practice. This can, in some cases, lead to situations that no one thinks of so quickly in advance.
The title of this piece is therefore an urgent piece of advice, especially to (potential) master franchisees: make sure that you know exactly where you stand with regard to the aforementioned and various other (legal) questions. Franchisees of a master franchisee are also well advised to ensure in advance that the organization has been built up in a responsible manner.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Damage estimate after wrongful termination of the franchise agreement by the franchisor
In a judgment of the Supreme Court of 15 September 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2372 (Franchisee/Coop), it was discussed that supermarket organization Coop had not complied with agreements, as a result of which the franchisee
Franchisor is obliged to extend the franchise agreement
On 6 September 2017, the Rotterdam District Court ruled, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:6975 (Misty / Bram Ladage), that the refusal to extend a franchise agreement by a franchisor
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.