Steady line in case law will be continued!
The judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 January 2002 has already been discussed several times in this series of articles.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 January 2002 has already been discussed several times in this series of articles.
In practice, it often happens that a franchisor finds it difficult to recruit new franchisees.
“Franchise Agreement” is not a legal term. The law sees a franchise agreement as an ordinary agreement.
It regularly happens that branch managers are invited to franchise the branch where they work.
It occurs in the best marriages and also in franchise relationships: a difference of opinion arises.
The question of whether there is a franchise agreement or a disguised employment contract remains under discussion
Internet sales are also enjoying increasing interest in conventional franchise circles.
Occasionally, a franchise agreement contains a clause that obliges the franchisee to take out legal expenses insurance.
In recent years, a large amount of jurisprudence has come to light regarding the non-achievement of the forecasts by the franchisee.
Some franchise constructions have the characteristic that the products or services in question are only supplied to certain consumers.