Sale of the franchise organization, consequences for the franchisees?
Last week it was announced that the HEMA organization may be sold by Maxeda, the owner of the organization. HEMA also has a number of franchise locations. Does the sale of a franchise organization affect the franchisees?
Many franchise agreements specifically regulate the sale of the organization by the franchisor. Such provisions allow the sale of the organization by the owner of the formula. However, when selling, the franchisor will have to respect the interests of the franchisees.
The agreement will continue to exist, but the formula itself will continue to exist and a sale will not have a negative impact on the formula or the franchisor’s care obligations to its franchisees.
In the event that the franchise agreement does not regulate anything when the franchise formula changes hands, it is actually no different. The franchisees are confronted with a different owner of the formula, but that new owner will also take over the applicable franchise agreements and must respect and comply with them. In the event of non-compliance, this can be enforced – in extreme cases before the courts. Even if no provision has been included in the franchise agreement that pertains to this situation, the franchisee may not be disadvantaged in the event of a takeover of a franchise formula.
On the other hand, the franchisees are also obliged to comply with the franchise agreement. In principle, a transfer of the formula will not change this. Only a material change to the franchise formula by the new owner may give the franchisee the option of rescinding or voiding the franchise agreement. There is no question of a substantial change when, for example, the house style is adjusted, but this can be the case when, for example, the entire product line is changed. Nevertheless, great restraint should be exercised with measures in this regard.
Because a new franchisor can implement new policies, it is preferable that it is clearly stated that sale of the organization is possible, but that in that case the franchisor will have to keep an eye on the rights and interests of the franchisees. Including a corresponding provision in the franchise agreement can contribute to that clarity.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Damage estimate after wrongful termination of the franchise agreement by the franchisor
In a judgment of the Supreme Court of 15 September 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:2372 (Franchisee/Coop), it was discussed that supermarket organization Coop had not complied with agreements, as a result of which the franchisee
Franchisor is obliged to extend the franchise agreement
On 6 September 2017, the Rotterdam District Court ruled, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:6975 (Misty / Bram Ladage), that the refusal to extend a franchise agreement by a franchisor
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.