More haste less speed

When entering into a franchise agreement, other agreements are often discussed. The law obliges the franchisor to provide all relevant information at least four weeks before concluding the franchise agreement. This is called the “stand-still arrangement”. This may include contracts to be concluded with third parties, such as a contractor in connection with the layout of the store. In practice, compliance with this is not always easy. Orders also fall under the stand-still arrangement
Orders placed by the franchisee via the franchisor fall under the stand-still arrangement. It becomes more complicated if an external party, such as a contractor, carries out work. In that case, a separate construction contract must be concluded. However, the contractor can claim that he has nothing to do with the franchise agreement and does not have to adhere to the stand-still period. Be careful with payments or investments
During the four weeks prior to the conclusion of the franchise agreement, the franchisor may not encourage payments or investments related to the agreement. It is not uncommon for the delivery of materials, such as inventory, to be delayed. It may then be wise to place orders in good time to limit the risk of delayed delivery as much as possible. This also applies to situations in which the franchisor proposes to place orders in advance with, for example, a contractor to perform services. Although it may seem wise to place orders in good time, the standstill period is actually intended as a cooling-off period. If the franchisor encourages the franchisee to place orders before the expiry of this period, he is probably acting in breach of the law. This may result in the franchisee being able to terminate the franchise agreement under certain circumstances. Careful compliance with the standstill
The standstill arrangement therefore plays a crucial role in entering into franchise agreements. It should give the franchisee the space to think carefully, without financial pressure. Attempts to circumvent the standstill period, such as placing “advance” orders, can have legal consequences and invalidate the franchise agreement. Carefulness and compliance with the rules are essential to avoid problems.

mr. A.W. Dolphijn
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

When does a franchisor go too far when recruiting franchisees?

The judgment of the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden on 5 February 2019 dealt with whether the franchisor had acted impermissibly when recruiting the franchisees.

Advisory Board on Regulatory Pressure (ATR) advises State Secretary Keijzer about the Franchise Act

In short, it is first advised to actively inform franchisors and franchisees about this amendment to the law.

Post non-competition ban on services and sales franchise

When a franchise agreement ends, many franchisees encounter a prohibition in the franchise agreement to perform similar work for a period of time thereafter

The concept of the Franchise Act: impact for franchisors and franchisees – dated February 5, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin

Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten believes that if the draft of the Franchise Act actually becomes law, a lot will change for franchisors and franchisees.

Buy franchise business and the laid off sick employee from 7 years ago

The question is whether a Bruna franchisee, when selling the franchise company to Bruna, should have stated that seven years ago an employee had left employment sick.

Court prohibits Domino’s unilateral area reduction when extending franchise agreements – dated January 28, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers

On January 9, 2019, the District Court of Rotterdam rendered a judgment in a lawsuit initiated by the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees and all its members (almost all Domino's franchisees).

By Remy Albers|28-01-2019|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top