Sale of the franchise organization, consequences for the franchisees?
Last week it was announced that the HEMA organization may be sold by Maxeda, the owner of the organization. HEMA also has a number of franchise locations. Does the sale of a franchise organization affect the franchisees?
Many franchise agreements specifically regulate the sale of the organization by the franchisor. Such provisions allow the sale of the organization by the owner of the formula. However, when selling, the franchisor will have to respect the interests of the franchisees.
The agreement will continue to exist, but the formula itself will continue to exist and a sale will not have a negative impact on the formula or the franchisor’s care obligations to its franchisees.
In the event that the franchise agreement does not regulate anything when the franchise formula changes hands, it is actually no different. The franchisees are confronted with a different owner of the formula, but that new owner will also take over the applicable franchise agreements and must respect and comply with them. In the event of non-compliance, this can be enforced – in extreme cases before the courts. Even if no provision has been included in the franchise agreement that pertains to this situation, the franchisee may not be disadvantaged in the event of a takeover of a franchise formula.
On the other hand, the franchisees are also obliged to comply with the franchise agreement. In principle, a transfer of the formula will not change this. Only a material change to the franchise formula by the new owner may give the franchisee the option of rescinding or voiding the franchise agreement. There is no question of a substantial change when, for example, the house style is adjusted, but this can be the case when, for example, the entire product line is changed. Nevertheless, great restraint should be exercised with measures in this regard.
Because a new franchisor can implement new policies, it is preferable that it is clearly stated that sale of the organization is possible, but that in that case the franchisor will have to keep an eye on the rights and interests of the franchisees. Including a corresponding provision in the franchise agreement can contribute to that clarity.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Column Franchise+ – mr. J. Sterk – “Franchisee does body check better than franchise check”
A gym embarks on a franchise concept that offers “Body Checks” and discounts to (potential) members in collaboration with health insurers.
Seminar Mrs. J. Sterk and M. Munnik – Thursday, November 2, 2017: “Important legal developments for franchisors”
Attorneys Jeroen Sterk and Maaike Munnik of Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten will update you on the status of and developments surrounding the Dutch Franchise Code and the Acquisition Fraude Act.
Goodwill at end of franchise agreement
In a case before the Amsterdam Court of Appeal on 26 September 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:3900 (Seal & Go), a franchisee claimed compensation for goodwill (ex Article 7:308 of the Dutch Civil Code) after the
Article in Entrance: “Resignation”
Fire an employee who is not performing well? The subdistrict court is strict. If you, as an employer, cannot demonstrate that you have done everything yourself to make the person function better, it will be
Cost price that is too high as a hidden franchise fee
An interlocutory judgment of the District Court of The Hague dated 30 August 2017, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:10597 (Happy Nurse) shows that the court has considered the question whether the
Supermarket letter – 19
Coop liability for damages due to non-performance towards the franchisee