The standstill period does not apply
On 17 August 2022, the District Court of Overijssel, ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2022:2385, settled a matter in which, among other things, the question was whether the legal standstill period should have been observed. The standstill period means that the franchisor provides all relevant information to the intended franchisee at least four weeks prior to the conclusion of the franchise agreement. If this has not happened, the concluded franchise agreement may be invalid.
The court rules that, although the agreement qualifies as a franchise agreement, there is no violation of the statutory standstill period. The legal standstill period for franchise agreements, as part of the so-called ‘Franchise Act’, came into force on 1 January 2021 and, on the basis of transitional law, became (largely) immediately applicable on the same date. The franchise agreement in this matter was concluded on November 21, 2020. This means that, even if the standstill period was not observed, it was not yet required by law at the time the franchise agreement was concluded. The court ruled that the franchise agreement was validly concluded.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages
Know-how and identity protection
One of the most essential parts of a franchise formula is
Internet sales in a franchise relationship
Internet sales are also enjoying increasing interest in conventional franchise circles.
What role does the franchisor play in the sale of a franchise business?
When a franchisee is thinking about selling his business, it is advisable
Litigation costs order
There is often a misconception about the reimbursement of legal costs
Franchisor in trouble, what to do?
It seems inevitable that the world is heading for a recession.
The bankrupt franchisor
In the penultimate contribution to this column, the phenomenon “Franchisor in difficulties, what to do?” discussed.




