More haste less speed

When entering into a franchise agreement, other agreements are often discussed. The law obliges the franchisor to provide all relevant information at least four weeks before concluding the franchise agreement. This is called the “stand-still arrangement”. This may include contracts to be concluded with third parties, such as a contractor in connection with the layout of the store. In practice, compliance with this is not always easy. Orders also fall under the stand-still arrangement
Orders placed by the franchisee via the franchisor fall under the stand-still arrangement. It becomes more complicated if an external party, such as a contractor, carries out work. In that case, a separate construction contract must be concluded. However, the contractor can claim that he has nothing to do with the franchise agreement and does not have to adhere to the stand-still period. Be careful with payments or investments
During the four weeks prior to the conclusion of the franchise agreement, the franchisor may not encourage payments or investments related to the agreement. It is not uncommon for the delivery of materials, such as inventory, to be delayed. It may then be wise to place orders in good time to limit the risk of delayed delivery as much as possible. This also applies to situations in which the franchisor proposes to place orders in advance with, for example, a contractor to perform services. Although it may seem wise to place orders in good time, the standstill period is actually intended as a cooling-off period. If the franchisor encourages the franchisee to place orders before the expiry of this period, he is probably acting in breach of the law. This may result in the franchisee being able to terminate the franchise agreement under certain circumstances. Careful compliance with the standstill
The standstill arrangement therefore plays a crucial role in entering into franchise agreements. It should give the franchisee the space to think carefully, without financial pressure. Attempts to circumvent the standstill period, such as placing “advance” orders, can have legal consequences and invalidate the franchise agreement. Carefulness and compliance with the rules are essential to avoid problems.

mr. A.W. Dolphijn
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

Franchisor fails by invoking a non-compete clause

Although a non-compete clause is validly formulated in a franchise agreement, a situation may arise that is so diffuse that the franchisor cannot invoke it.

Acquisitions and Franchise Interest

It will not have escaped anyone's attention, certainly in the last year it can only be concluded that the Dutch economy is once again on the rise.

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+.

By Ludwig en van Dam|20-12-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Franchisor convicted under the Acquisition Fraud Act

For the first time, a court has ruled, with reference to the Acquisition Fraud Act, that if a franchisee claims that the franchisor has presented an unsatisfactory prognosis

Agreements Related to the Franchise Agreement

On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).

Go to Top