Vacancy: Lawyer employee and a Lawyer trainee

By Published On: 04-02-2021Categories: Statements & current affairs

Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten is a law firm that specializes entirely in franchise and other partnerships and is the market leader of its kind in the Netherlands. The office has extensive knowledge and experience and is characterized by a high level of thinking and working. Due to growth of the practice, we are looking for a:

Attorney-at-law

and a:

Lawyer trainee

Specific experience in the franchise practice is a plus.

We offer a working environment where you can work and develop in an excellent and relaxed collegial atmosphere. Some relevant work experience is desirable.

Information can be requested from Mr. Th.R. Ludwig, e-mail address: ludwig@ludwigvandam.nl or mw. mr. M. Munnik, e-mail address: munnik@ludwigvandam.nl , to whom the application letter can also be addressed.

You can also send your written application to the following address:

Ludwig & Van Dam Attorneys
Attn Mrs. mr. Munnik
Park avenue 44
3016 BC ROTTERDAM

Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to info@ludwigvandamadvocaten.nl

Other messages

Franchisor fails by invoking a non-compete clause

Although a non-compete clause is validly formulated in a franchise agreement, a situation may arise that is so diffuse that the franchisor cannot invoke it.

Acquisitions and Franchise Interest

It will not have escaped anyone's attention, certainly in the last year it can only be concluded that the Dutch economy is once again on the rise.

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+.

By Ludwig en van Dam|20-12-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Franchisor convicted under the Acquisition Fraud Act

For the first time, a court has ruled, with reference to the Acquisition Fraud Act, that if a franchisee claims that the franchisor has presented an unsatisfactory prognosis

Agreements Related to the Franchise Agreement

On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).

Go to Top